View Full Version : .35 Remington vs 30-30
gap45
11-28-2005, 01:07 PM
Hello Fellow Shooters-
What are the pros/cons when
comparing the .35 Remington to the 30-30. I know
the 30 ammo is considerably cheaper, but not much
beyond that. Opinions?
Gap 45
Jack Monteith
11-28-2005, 02:21 PM
Errrrr..., Your text is asking about opinions on the .30-30 and .35 Remington, but your choices in the poll don't include either one. Just what do you want to do here? It looks like you should start over.
Bye
Jack
gap45
11-28-2005, 03:43 PM
Errrrr..., Your text is asking about opinions on the .30-30 and .35 Remington, but your choices in the poll don't include either one. Just what do you want to do here? It looks like you should start over.
Bye
Jack
Thank you for pointing that out-the two are not directly
related, plus I saw another post AFTER I sent this one
that already answered my vs. question(s). So now the
poll stands alone as written.
Kragman71
11-28-2005, 04:33 PM
Hello,
My personal favorite,for 50 years,is the 1894 Springfield(sporterized),in 30/40 caliber.
I rate the 30/30 and the 35 Rem as dead even as deer slayers.
Frank
Ranch Dog
11-28-2005, 06:00 PM
Thank you for pointing that out-the two are not directly
related, plus I saw another post AFTER I sent this one
that already answered my vs. question(s). So now the
poll stands alone as written.
Then why don't you use the "EDIT" button to edit the tile. We like to keep things organized here so the search engine will find the info later. The poll has nothing to do with the title.
444 Marlin for me.
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.