Brad Y
08-29-2006, 05:06 AM
Hi everybody
Im in the process of re applying for a firearm license here in WA as i was knocked back for applying for a high powered rifle (222 or 223) Basically i couldnt satisfy the authorities requirements and am not a property owner for shooting on.
So im going for a 22 hornet license which should not be a problem. We already have a gun cabinet at home for my fathers rimfire so i dont need to purchase one of those if i choose to purchase a rifle.
My main dilemma is that i have to have a 22 hornet licensed to use. ie an acutal rifle, serial number etc. My uncle who is my main shooting partner wants to get all his rifles up to his 22 hornet under my license as i have used them before(22LR semi auto, 12 guage shotgun which is being destroyed anyway and air rifle)- he also wants his 243 under it too but i very much doubt that will happen. So i can have his hornet on my license but i have been given the opportunity to purchase a brand new ruger bolt action 22 hornet with a 3-9x scope and trigger job included for $960AUS which is quite cheap. I dont know make or model of my uncles but its a single shot and is a nice rifle which suits me being left handed more than the ruger which is a right handed model. The main benefit of the bolt action is being able to fire shots off quicker than the single shot.
Im having difficulty weighing up the benefits of owning my own rifle or having my uncles on my license and saving the 900 odd dollars and going halves with him on a new O/U shotgun which will also get covered on my license. His property is the main one i shoot on but also have the other side of the family offering to let me shoot on theirs. Quite a few friends have also got properties and are keen to go on a few fox hunts.
Any suggestions on what would be better off?
Im in the process of re applying for a firearm license here in WA as i was knocked back for applying for a high powered rifle (222 or 223) Basically i couldnt satisfy the authorities requirements and am not a property owner for shooting on.
So im going for a 22 hornet license which should not be a problem. We already have a gun cabinet at home for my fathers rimfire so i dont need to purchase one of those if i choose to purchase a rifle.
My main dilemma is that i have to have a 22 hornet licensed to use. ie an acutal rifle, serial number etc. My uncle who is my main shooting partner wants to get all his rifles up to his 22 hornet under my license as i have used them before(22LR semi auto, 12 guage shotgun which is being destroyed anyway and air rifle)- he also wants his 243 under it too but i very much doubt that will happen. So i can have his hornet on my license but i have been given the opportunity to purchase a brand new ruger bolt action 22 hornet with a 3-9x scope and trigger job included for $960AUS which is quite cheap. I dont know make or model of my uncles but its a single shot and is a nice rifle which suits me being left handed more than the ruger which is a right handed model. The main benefit of the bolt action is being able to fire shots off quicker than the single shot.
Im having difficulty weighing up the benefits of owning my own rifle or having my uncles on my license and saving the 900 odd dollars and going halves with him on a new O/U shotgun which will also get covered on my license. His property is the main one i shoot on but also have the other side of the family offering to let me shoot on theirs. Quite a few friends have also got properties and are keen to go on a few fox hunts.
Any suggestions on what would be better off?