sniper1958
09-23-2007, 01:37 PM
To any who might disagree with Nick - his help with the 165 SST (.30-06) was right on the money! The optimum load for the 165 Hornady SST with IMR 4350 was, in fact, 57.3 grains. The lower end load was OK, but this one is hot and accurate (.250" inside, .400" outside) and printed 5.5" high on a Redfield target (compared to 1.5" with my old Ballistic Tip 165's). I would really appreciate your help again with the computer program.
I want to load the 180gr Accubond and accurately push it over 2700 fps. My .30-06 barrel length is 21 29/32", brass trim length is 2.486", empty brass weight 195.47 gr., full of water (no meniscus) is 265.40 gr. Ballistic coefficient is .507 and sectional density is .271. I plan to use RL-19 powder, but can return it and exchange for something any of you recommend if necessary. I hope to maximize velocity and get superb accuracy.
The second part of this is to compare the 180 with the 200 AB. The 200's BC is .588 and the SD is .301. I'd love to be able to push the 200 over 2700 fps and still get .500" at 100 yds. My gut, however, tells me the 180 AB will be the faster and more accurate load.
Thanks! I appreciate any help you can offer.
I want to load the 180gr Accubond and accurately push it over 2700 fps. My .30-06 barrel length is 21 29/32", brass trim length is 2.486", empty brass weight 195.47 gr., full of water (no meniscus) is 265.40 gr. Ballistic coefficient is .507 and sectional density is .271. I plan to use RL-19 powder, but can return it and exchange for something any of you recommend if necessary. I hope to maximize velocity and get superb accuracy.
The second part of this is to compare the 180 with the 200 AB. The 200's BC is .588 and the SD is .301. I'd love to be able to push the 200 over 2700 fps and still get .500" at 100 yds. My gut, however, tells me the 180 AB will be the faster and more accurate load.
Thanks! I appreciate any help you can offer.