PDA

View Full Version : Ruger wins another lawsuit


alyeska338
10-07-2003, 05:24 PM
Dow Jones Business News
Sturm Ruger Rifle Has No Design Defects, Jury Finds
Tuesday October 7, 4:40 pm ET


SOUTHPORT, Conn. (Dow Jones)--Sturm Ruger & Co.'s rifle design was found to reasonably safe and free from defects by an Alaska jury.
The case, Whaley v. Sturm Ruger & Co. (NYSE:RGR - News), involved a hunter who suffered a gunshot wound to his hand, which was placed over the muzzle of a loaded Ruger M77 rifle while he was cleaning the trigger area with the safety off.

In a press release Tuesday, the gunmaker said the verdict continues its 30- year record of winning product liability cases. The company attributed its record to its ongoing product safety measures.

Four product liability suits are currently pending against the company, the lowest since product liability cases began in the 1970s, Sturm Ruger said.

Sturm Ruger and other firearm makers have faced a spate of lawsuits in recent years alleging that the companies sell unsafe products and create a public nuisance. Many of these suits in various cities and counties across the country have been dismissed.

In June, the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, affirmed the dismissal of claims made by New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer that Sturm Ruger & Co. and other firearms makers were liable for the public costs of urban gun violence. Spitzer's lawsuit wanted to force the firearms industry to make handguns with more elaborate safety guards, to place tighter control on retail gun sales and to keep guns from criminal and juvenile users.

Company Web site: http://www.ruger-firearms.com

- Nora Devine; Dow Jones Newswires

TedH
10-08-2003, 10:04 PM
Sounds like a "no brainer" verdict to me. Hopefully this sue-happy idiot will have to pay for Ruger's legal costs too.

HUNTER_IN_AK
12-08-2003, 10:58 AM
Hate to say it but I wish he would have looked in the barrel for "obstructions" while cleaning the trigger area. Darwin's theory would have went to work for society.

kdub
12-08-2003, 01:40 PM
The stupidity level of some people never cease to amaze me. Take the clowns that sit on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, for example...................................

spanky
12-08-2003, 02:17 PM
Well, its great to hear some good news for a change.

Rylos1
12-08-2003, 02:54 PM
Absolutely amazing, how do these people survive through their teens?

amndouglas
03-22-2004, 05:58 PM
Absolutely amazing, how do these people survive through their teens?

Our society protects them with laws regarding warning labels like "Product may be hot after heating."

warpig
03-22-2004, 06:03 PM
suffered a gunshot wound to his hand, which was placed over the muzzle of a loaded Ruger M77 rifle while he was cleaning the trigger area with the safety off.


This clown is lucky to be alive. The question is- Does he deserve to be?

What a maroon

44SandW
03-22-2004, 08:42 PM
Absolutely amazing, how do these people survive through their teens?

I'm 18 and ill say its all luck! and people like me that play in a band and go shooting tend to be targeted as the bad kids when really, im totally drug, alcohol and sex free. which is something i cant say for most teens!

Glocknut
03-22-2004, 10:50 PM
You would think that guys lawyer should have told him he did'nt have a case.......but maybe lawyers just don't care as long as they get their money.....
:mad:

mike
aka Glockcrazy..gt

Indy7373
03-23-2004, 07:35 AM
All lawyer saw was a possible suit against a gun manufactuor. He was probably hoping for a very liberal jury. That, and his fee of course.

Festus
03-26-2004, 04:08 AM
What is really frightening,is this moron has no doubt been driving back and forth to the court house,talking on a cellphone,and inhaling the latest Mcdelicasy!


Festus

"It takes a big man to cry,but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man."

Contender
03-26-2004, 07:02 AM
The sad part is Ruger has to spend thousands and thousands of dollars to defend against these frivilous suits and naturally has to pass that cost ultimately on to the rest of us.

This gentleman should be required to pay all court costs and should also be fined for negligence with a firearm.

Maybe that would make him think about what he is doing around firearms. Undoubtedly he'll shoot his other hand in the future. (grin)

People should just take responsibility for their own mistakes instead of pointing the finger at others like this company.


Regards

hatch
03-26-2004, 09:04 AM
IIRC, the lawsuit that started the trigger controversy for Remington in the late 70's (and the recall of the various "600" models) was initiated by a lawyer who was returning from the range. His son was in the back seat with a loaded rifle when it went off, shooting the lawyer and paralyzing him. I would certainly have thought that there was no case here, too, but he won............