Richard of Oz
12-19-2003, 04:17 PM
The Condor furore down the board concerning (some) environmentalists' agenda prompts me to tell you about a couple of ways in which shooting is threatened in Australia.
Environment:
My local outdoor range abuts a state forest. Don't know why, but public service attracts a lot of folk who are anti-shooting. A pipsqueak environmental officer from the shire council issued an order to close the range becaiuse of what he said were high levels of lead escaping into the state forest. The state police (by and large pro-shooting) intervened to say that they used the range for practice, and the council suspended the order while extensive and expensive work was done to contain airborne lead within the range and its extractor systems (it's an outdoor range!) At this local level we don't need to guess people's true agendas, we know them well. The environmental officer didn't give a fig about the state forest, he wanted to get at shooters because he thought that politicians weren't suffiiciently assiduous in banning handguns.
Health & Safety:
My (25m indoor) club range has achieved much positive publicity and firearm familiarisation by allowing non-members to try out the sport with club firearms. Membership is booming. One day recently, I walked in to see fairground-sideshow-style steel tethers in some of the bays. A health & safety officer had tried to shut down the range because unlicensed shooters (under strict and safe RO supervision) were using the place, and might shoot themselves or other people. Of course, we all know the bureaucrat involved, and her purpose was solely to get at the evil but popular pistol club. The range's outstanding safety record and practices didn't come into it. We don't get so many people trying out the sport in the weeks since the tethers went up for unlicensed shooters. Imagine adopting a weaver or isosceles stance with a dirty great steel pole holding your revolver.
Environment:
My local outdoor range abuts a state forest. Don't know why, but public service attracts a lot of folk who are anti-shooting. A pipsqueak environmental officer from the shire council issued an order to close the range becaiuse of what he said were high levels of lead escaping into the state forest. The state police (by and large pro-shooting) intervened to say that they used the range for practice, and the council suspended the order while extensive and expensive work was done to contain airborne lead within the range and its extractor systems (it's an outdoor range!) At this local level we don't need to guess people's true agendas, we know them well. The environmental officer didn't give a fig about the state forest, he wanted to get at shooters because he thought that politicians weren't suffiiciently assiduous in banning handguns.
Health & Safety:
My (25m indoor) club range has achieved much positive publicity and firearm familiarisation by allowing non-members to try out the sport with club firearms. Membership is booming. One day recently, I walked in to see fairground-sideshow-style steel tethers in some of the bays. A health & safety officer had tried to shut down the range because unlicensed shooters (under strict and safe RO supervision) were using the place, and might shoot themselves or other people. Of course, we all know the bureaucrat involved, and her purpose was solely to get at the evil but popular pistol club. The range's outstanding safety record and practices didn't come into it. We don't get so many people trying out the sport in the weeks since the tethers went up for unlicensed shooters. Imagine adopting a weaver or isosceles stance with a dirty great steel pole holding your revolver.