The web's most comprehensive user-interactive handloading database! Find the loading data created by handloaders, for handloaders, post your pet loads, or access and develop your own online loading database with our LoadNotes personal handloading database software. This feature, unique in its concept and intuitive in it's data presentation is fast to access, superbly organized and comprehensive in scope.Our online forums for questions and answers on many shooting and outdoor related topics. A dynamic, active, and well-informed resource for your enjoyment and interaction. Our most used resource on this website! Come share the experience with us!
» Advanced
  #1  
Old 03-27-2001, 06:28 AM
Jake Jake is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 7
Why doesn't anyone make a levergun in 454 casull?  I think this would be very cool.  I am guessing the gun could be light and compact, and I am sure it would be quite powerful.  If chamber pressure is such a problem, then why can a 6 shot revolver handle it?  Just wondering.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-27-2001, 06:44 AM
Bill Lester's Avatar
Bill Lester Bill Lester is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Latrobe, PA
Posts: 1,118
Never uderestimate the durability of a well-crafted revolver. I've been lead to the understanding that in several ways it is easier to build an ultra-tough five or six-shooter than a comparably strong rifle. I still don't "get" all the engineering mumbo jumbo but it's there.

The 454 Casull operates at a SAAMI spec of 65,000 psi, greater than many high velocity, bottleneck rifle cartridges. Making a durable lever action for the round would be an expensive engineering problem with limited return for the manufacturer. It could be done but how many would buy one?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-27-2001, 11:12 AM
MT Callahan MT Callahan is offline
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 194
Jake,

When its all said and done, a rifle strong enough to handle the pressure of the 454 would be large enough to be chambered in 45-70. Of course between the two the 45-70 is much more versatile. I'm first to admit a weakness for rifles chambered in a pistol cartridge but the 454 rifle just wouldn't be practical.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-30-2001, 02:13 PM
Charlie Z's Avatar
Charlie Z Charlie Z is offline
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 556
Browning's most powerful cartridge for the low-wall is the .260 Rem, while the .454 Casull is on the stronger hi-wall action.  

Kinda seems backwards, with pistol cartridges in a "rifle action" and rifle cartridges in a "pistol-cartridge action."  But, at 65k psi, I guess it needs the metal.
 
- Charlie
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.500 S&W Levergun? rock steady Leverguns and Their Cartridges (General) 13 03-05-2004 06:34 PM
50 Cal. in a Levergun? Reb Leverguns and Their Cartridges (General) 23 08-31-2003 07:47 AM
Levergun Accuracy Fixes and a 356? Reb Leverguns and Their Cartridges (General) 2 08-25-2003 08:58 PM
Cool new Ruger 45 MattC Handguns 1 01-08-2002 08:12 PM
Levergun Scopes Stranger Leverguns and Their Cartridges (General) 18 09-26-2001 10:20 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:04 PM.

< Contact Us - Shooters Forum - Archive >

 
 

All Content & Design Copyright © 1999-2002 Beartooth Bullets, All Rights Reserved
View Privacy Policy | Contact Webmaster | Legal Information
Website Design & Development By Exbabylon Internet Solutions

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.