The web's most comprehensive user-interactive handloading database! Find the loading data created by handloaders, for handloaders, post your pet loads, or access and develop your own online loading database with our LoadNotes personal handloading database software. This feature, unique in its concept and intuitive in it's data presentation is fast to access, superbly organized and comprehensive in scope.Our online forums for questions and answers on many shooting and outdoor related topics. A dynamic, active, and well-informed resource for your enjoyment and interaction. Our most used resource on this website! Come share the experience with us!
» Advanced

Go Back   Shooters Forum > Handloading > Bullet Casting
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-03-2002, 08:18 PM
Gunnut45 Gunnut45 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 10
I pose the question to you old heads- is this a good way to sort cast bulets when a scale is not available. Can this be used to help improve accuracy? I find that my Lee mould will throw any where from .635 to .649 length bullets. That adds up to some differance in weight as well as seating depth/ cart capacity changes. As far as diameter it is very close to .452 sizing die I don't alot of metal removed during this process. Generally I've found that .640 is the majority thrown ( 50%),with .645 ( 35%) next biggest portion of say 100 bullets cast. The rest fall +/- .002 either way.
Your inputs please.
__________________
[/b]GUNNUT45
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-04-2002, 03:59 AM
cast-n-blast cast-n-blast is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poolesville, Md
Posts: 220
Gunnut45,
            Rather than measure, I visually inspect each bullet for smoothness, being well filled out, and most importantly, the base. As the base is the steering mechanism of the bullet, it should be devoid of any craters or lumps, and have a nice sharp square appearance of 90 degrees. Any deformities, back in the pot they go. The base bottom should have an almost glass like appearance to it. When closing the mold handles between cycles, close them smoothly, to save wear on the mold, and I tap the handle arms lightly, to ensure the mold is closed all the way on my work bench. When using Lee molds, I visually inspect the cavities to make sure they are lined up correctly, before closing the sprue plate. Consistency is everything.

                          Jeff
__________________
Bullet weight and diameter are constant, velocity is always a diminishing variable. I like the hunt to be over after the shot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-04-2002, 06:09 AM
MikeG's Avatar
MikeG MikeG is offline
The Hog Whisperer (Administrator)
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 18,640
That's quite a length variance.  When you measure, are the calipers hitting the sprue cut-off?
__________________
MikeG

Quote:
Originally Posted by faucettb
Welcome to the forum. Rules are simple, be nice and join in.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-04-2002, 07:35 AM
Jack Monteith's Avatar
Jack Monteith Jack Monteith is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 7,859
Hi, GunNut45:
   I'm still pretty green at casting, but I've found that very few bullets that pass the eyeball test fail on the scale.  Electronic scales don't save you much time when you're weighing powder, but they're absolutely marvelous for sorting cast bullets.

   Mike likely has a point. Is your sprue plate too loose? If you're not hitting the sprure plate at the same angle every time, you could be getting your length variance there.  I wear insulated gloves and push the sprue plate off with my thumb. That gives me a much better feel for how faster the bullet is cooling as well as a consistant push-off angle.

Bye
Jack
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-06-2002, 03:56 AM
William Iorg William Iorg is offline
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,002
Jack

This may or may not help.
Check out two articles from Handloader. The first by Rick Jamison in Handloader #50. The second by Fredrick A. Hohorst, "The Lead Content of Cast Bullet Aloys." They are both in the Wolfe cast bullet book.
In these two articles they compared pure lead to alloys and with a math formulae were able to figure bullet hardness, (Jamison used a chart, Hohorst used a math formula, he's my hero!) it works, but is complicated.
Mr. Hohorst compared Lymans mold #357446.
With known PURE lead under careful conditions the bullets weighed out with 0.3gr difference when weighed in air. When weighed in water the differance was 0.3 gr. The difference in length was 0.0006"
The cavity in the mold was 0.6935" long, the average bullet length was 0.69021.
In a known alloy again under careful conditions the bullets weight variation in air was 0.5gr. In water the weight difference was 0.5gr. The bullet length difference was 0.0011".
As you can see even with a known alloy under very careful conditions there is a much greater difference in bullet length than you would think.
At home with lead alloys that are not as uniform from ingot to ingot there will be an even greater variation in length and weight.
From my experiance with production hunting class rifles I have difficulty seeing a difference in groups with a full 5 grain weight variation in bullet weight.
In heavy barreled rifles with high power scopes I can see the difference and call the impact point of bullets outside the group when shooting bullets of different weight.
The best thing to do is to alloy all of your lead at the same time and ensure that you flux and stir regularly when casting.
I no longer think about bullet length, but I do compare the specific gravity of my alloys and try to seperate them by hardness, as this will effect the uniformity of my bullets and subsequent groups.
When my eyes are uncrossed this is an interesting subject!
__________________
slim
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alloys..Soft? Hard? Any Advantage arkypete Handloading Procedures/Practices 3 03-02-2006 07:12 PM
HELP!  22K-Hornet and cast bullets 35remington Rifles and Rifle Cartridges 17 04-22-2004 07:50 AM
44-40 Original Ballistics Kanuck Leverguns and Their Cartridges (General) 14 02-25-2003 07:44 PM
Here's a question for the experts. Muleskinner Bullet Casting 5 05-28-2002 03:40 PM
Reloading CAst Bullets Trapper53 Handgun Cartridges 4 04-25-2001 11:30 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:17 PM.

< Contact Us - Shooters Forum - Archive >

 
 

All Content & Design Copyright © 1999-2002 Beartooth Bullets, All Rights Reserved
View Privacy Policy | Contact Webmaster | Legal Information
Website Design & Development By Exbabylon Internet Solutions

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.